Remediation parts 2 and 3: The Remediated Self and Taking Things to Extreme

Remediated Spaces, Actors and Animatronics

The second installment of Remediation by Bolter and Grusin explored how several media reform, refashion, improve on older media. This list of media included virtual reality, computer graphics, and remediated spaces such as Disney World. When I was a child, I wanted to work with audio animatronics when I grew up. That is, until I realized I had zero interest in learning the principles of electronics (which you probably should have if you’re going to work in that field). Nonetheless, the idea of a remediated space such as Disney World, offering remediated figurines of actual persons in history or actors from films is pretty mind-boggling. Add to that, the A-100 animatronic figures they are using now are “just like A-1 animatronics, only better!” “Compliance” (the body’s ability to absorb shocks and sudden gestures, yet still maintains its balance) is what makes the A-100’s better than the original A-1 figures developed for the World’s Fair in 1964. The geek in me absolutely loves this video:

Disney Animatronics: A video from The Travel Channel on Youtube

As Bolter and Grusin say, the two logics (of transparency and hypermediacy) “are alternate strategies for achieving the same goal of the real or authentic experience” (233). So when Uncle Walt (Disney) decided that there needed to be a 3-D experience of animated characters, and the goal was to expand on that “illusion of life” in his animated films, he was remediating earlier media, such as 2-D animation, film, photography, audio recordings, and even wax figures which didn’t offer the 3-D, life-size, moving and talking illusion of the person standing in front of you, not on a screen.

The Remediated Self

The last section of Remediation brought Bolter and Grusin’s ideas to how new media impacts the concept of the self, especially the Networked Self, The Virtual Self and The Remediated Self. This of course echoes questions brought up in Do Androids Dream of Electric Sheep? where the main thing that differentiated humans from androids was empathy. What makes a human perceived to be genuine or artificial?

The Remediated Self mentions how some people have come to view their bodies as a canvas to use as a form of expression, much like putting on a particular style of clothing. However, these individuals often make more permanent changes to their physical bodies, through plastic surgery, bodybuilding and/or tatooing. Their examples of people like Orlan demanded that I find out more about what Bolter and Grusin were talking about:

A video from the on French performance artist, Orlan.

Bolter and Grusin’s chapter on The Remediated Self, was very interesting but it also displayed the drawbacks of traditional books. When the whole discussion is about visuals and multimedia, and there aren’t any actual examples you can see in the book (not even a photo), one needs to turn to another medium. Thank God for Youtube.

That led me to find this comparison of before/after plastic surgeries which is interesting because I hope it echoes a growing sentiment that plastic surgery doesn’t always yield a natural appearance, “only better.” Unfortunately, those that pay for it seem to be the last to know since they often go for repeated surgeries, remediating the aging process. And yet most of the time if the person is trying to look younger, the surgery doesn’t make them look like they did when they were younger. Bolter and Grusin talk about the extremes of hypermediacy which creates a more “artificial life” (218). This artificiality definitely can be seen in the surgically-altered faces of many celebrities and socialites.

Celebrity plastic surgery better or worse or fake??

Uber-Hypermediacy leading to Artificiality

The idea of plastic surgery conjured up a scene from Terry Gilliam’s Brazil that has haunted me ever since I saw it. As it’s from a Gilliam movie, it’s not a pretty picture, but I think he makes his point quite well.

Brazil (2/10) Movie CLIP - Plastic Surgery (1985)

Next, a word from a self-proclaimed “dude” who argues that culturally gals wear too much makeup because they have forgotten who they are and think the makeup is what they look like. He’s forgetting that a lot of this idea comes from the stupid women’s magazines that make money on making their readers feel inferior so the advertisers can sell more products. Did I mean to stay “stupid?” You bet I did! You’ve GOT to love this kid!

My opinion on girls who wear too much makeup

I haven’t worn makeup since the week I got married nearly 22 years ago because I married a guy with a similar opinion. I personally don’t view my body as a canvas, so I think the only thing I lost was opportunities to spend more money. I can live with that.

Finally, returning to the idea of hypermediacy and extremes, a video from the classic show Mystery Science Theater 3000 which warns against the extremes of technological advancement. As McLuhan says in Laws of Media, any medium becomes the antithesis of itself if given enough time and resources (McLuhan):

FrankTube: Inventive Design

Tutorial Reflections

As I stated earlier, I am interested in developing an acronym generator in Javascript for the place where I work. The place uses a lot of them, so there has to be an efficient way to call up each acronym description for each acronym. For now, I’ve gone through the first hour’s worth of Lynda tutorials and I’m excited that I’m beginning to see the basics of Javascript structure!

For instance, I’ve seen “==” and “===” but now I know that “=” merely assigns something and is not meant to calculate a tally. “==” means equals in the way you’d expect. “===” means that for the script to work, there has to be a STRICT equality of one thing to another. Little things like that and “!=” (meaning “is not equal to”) are going to be very helpful to make heads or tails out of any script I come across.

The biggest thing I found valuable in this week’s learning session is why there are tiny little “.js” scripts that have to be in the same folder as the HTML file but that are not part of the HTML file. This is sort of like CSS where you are manipulating the script in its own file rather than trying to do so within the HTML file. Therefore the HTML file has to have a line that defines where the script is coming from. Javascript is still a user-side language, so that cleared up a lot to me.

I am starting with no experience with Javascript, but I can tell having HTML under my belt along with a little ActionScript 2 (and a 6 week Fortran course back in the 1980’s) experience is helpful. I’ve been looking to see if anyone has any Javascript code for an acronym generator, and I found a couple. However, neither is exactly what I want so I’m going back to finish more of the tutorials so I have a better sense of the type of code to look for and see how to manipulate it. I’m sticking with my acronym generator idea for now, but if it turns out I can figure it out sooner rather than later, then I’ll be trying to configure a really nice looking one and one that will function properly in our LMS at work. I started outside my comfort zone, but it’s beginning to make sense!

Bolter, J.D. and R. Grusin. (2000). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

McLuhan, M. (1989). Laws of Media. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

This entry was posted in Fellow Bloggers. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Remediation parts 2 and 3: The Remediated Self and Taking Things to Extreme

  1. You make a great point about how inadequate a book of text can be for the topic of remediation in our society today. Your videos were great additions — the one about the French artist was fascinating. She saw a future and shocked people … but putting that video next to the plastic surgeries of Hollywood stars video shows how right she was. I am one of the peer reviewers for your wiki page on this book — I am very interested to see it because his ideas are clearly intriguing.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *